by: R Kawecki
Over one day to extract simplicity out of
complexity? If others could have given us special relativity, who else but
Einstein, sixty-four years ago, could have given us general relativity? Who
else knew out of the welter of facts to fasten on that which is absolutely
central? Did the central point come to him, as legend has it, from talking to a
house painter who had fallen off a roof and reported feeling weightless during
the fall? We all know that he called that 1908 insight the "happiest
thought of my life"— the idea that there is no such thing as gravitation,
only free-fall.
Einstein won gravitation as a
manifestation of a warp in the geometry of space. His 1915 and still standard
geometric theory of gravitation is summarized the way we know today, in a
single, simple sentence: "Space
tells matter how to move and matter tells space how to curve." Through his insight that there is no such
thing as gravity, he had had the creative imagination to bring to get her two
great currents of thought out of the past. Riemann had stressed that geometry
is not a God-given perfection, but a part of physics; and Mach had argued that
acceleration makes no sense except with respect to frame determined by the
other masses in the universe.
The three famous early tests of Einstein's
geometric theory of gravitation: the bending of light by the sun, the red-shift
of light from the sun, and the precession of the orbit of the planet Mercury
going around the sun. Neither is it necessary to expound the important insights
that have come and continue to come out of general relativity. Einstein showed
that the law for the motion of a mass in space and time does not have to be
made a separate item.
The collapse at the center of a black hole
marks a third " gate of time," additional to the big bang and the big
crunch. Einstein tried to escape all three. Two years after general relativity,
Einstein was already applying it to cosmology. He gave reasons to regard the
universe as closed and qualitatively similar to a three dimensional sphere, the
three-dimensional generalization of the surface of a rubber balloon.
To his surprise, he found that the universe
is dynamic and not static. Einstein could not accept this result. First, he
found fault with Alexander Friedmann's mathematics. Then he retracted this
criticism, and looked for the fault in his own theory of gravitation. It turned
out there was no natural way to change that theory. The arguments of simplicity
and correspondence in the appropriate limit with the Newtonian theory of
gravitation left no alternative. There being no natural way to change the
theory, he looked for the least unnatural way he could find to alter it. He
introduced a so-called "cosmological term" with the sole point and
purpose to hold the universe static. A decade later, Edwin Hubble, working at
Mount Wilson Observatory, gave convincing evidence that the universe is
actually expanding. Thereafter, Einstein remarked that the cosmological term
"was the biggest blunder of my life."*
In December 1978
announced impressive evidence.*One does not need to go into the theory of
gravitationally collapsed objects or the evidence we have today, some
impressive, some less convincing, for black holes: one of some ten solar masses
in the constellation Cygnus; others in the range of a hundred or a thousand
solar masses at the centers of five of the star clusters in our galaxy; one
about four million times as massive as the sun at the center of the Milky Way;
and one with a mass of about five billion suns in the center of the galaxy M87.
How
such a stellar BH ?(seed) could grow by 6−7 orders of magnitude in mass, in few hundred million years, is another
daunting task given the limits on accretion. The idea, that a set of very
specific physical conditions found only in the early Universe, In this study we refer to a black hole with
mass > 106M⊙ as supermassive.
Explaining the first
supermassive black holes could
have allowed for the formation of massive seed black holes with
masses in the range of 104−5 M, could be a potential solution to this
problem as the seed would now need to grow by only 3–4 orders of magnitude
in mass to attain supermassive scales. Direct collapse (DC)
channel of forming massive seed black holes aim of this is to
understand the plausibility of the set of physical conditions required for
direct collapse and its impact on the evolution of the first galaxies. A nick
name theory addressed in The Quanta Physics Theory applauds a new theory that
besides the big bang theory the universe was formed by the multiple collapse of
the earliest spheres as in the result of a black hole explanation here and nick
named “The Popcorn Universe Theory and which addresses the probability that matter
manifested through the brethrens three-dimensional generalization surface of a rubber balloon as prehistoric
spheres (seeds) called ‘embryus’ procured out of the fabric surface mass not as
a single bang as in the big bang theory but as in an multiple entre of young spheres that manifested later into the
existing galaxies saw today a beginning entre point of over 13.8 billion years
ago. The emphasis is on understanding
how frequently do the conditions required for DC occur at z > 6 and not on the actual formation process
itself occurs it’s more analogical to understand that the early prehistoric
universe was by the independent formation of the galaxies forming and not as a
singularity theory.
The birth of the Milky Way comes from the
measurable collapse mass of a gigantic black hole one with a mass of about five
billion suns as the one in the center of the galaxy M87 is
evidence from relativity that the galaxy is the aftermath of a massive
collapsed deity. (embryus) Black holes what are they? Where do they come from?
And what are they for? To some it is thought to be what is called The Big Gun a
portal where matter arrived through the fabric of space the manifestation of
the cosmic egg to some. There exist no evidence on which way the black hole is
spinning whether inwards or outwards.
Assumed to come from a galactic collapse the portal is assuming matter
and energy towards it and not away from it. A collapse followed by a bang
allows matter to be formed creating dense matter.
The follow up on black holes is the fact
that the deities formed in the galactic realms are all shaped in a round model
whether it be a star or a planet inside the galaxy. Evidence has shown that
these spheres like our own earth seem to be growing in size and mass they are
getting bigger. It seems most likely that these spheres are manifestations of a
cosmic egg or embryus egg making the idea that beginning from the big bang
event that all matter assumed a analogical molecular inflation as described in
the big bang theory to some it seems more likely that the spheres made at the
galactic level bangs are actually rounded shape some sort of physical growing
egg.
Two years after general relativity,
Einstein was applying special relativity to cosmology. He gave reasons to
regard the universe as closed inside of
the balloon and qualitatively
similar to a three sphere, the
three-dimensional generalization of the surface of a rubber balloon. New facts
show using the arithmetic shows the galaxies reside outside the bubble and in
contradiction with Einstein’s ideas about the universe. Still today Stephen
Hawkins illustrates a bubble universe in which we reside inside this bubble.
The mathematical facts in Quanta Physics show how matter assumed from a massive
black hole and was followed by allusive low pressure inflation of the assumed
bubble and by which matter resides on its fabric surface meaning outside the
bubble itself not inside it. It could be followed that receding galaxies are
pushing the bubble causing it to expand from the inside of it but than
inflation due to the increase of the bubble’s pressure of dark matter is
questioned.
Another great mystery about the universe I
think a count is the analogy that all the planets, stars and deities of
planetary matter seem all to be round in shape like a ball even from dark stars
at the universe’s youngest age. It follows that in a early universe all the
deities must have been closer together than they are today. Like Plato’s theory
about the world planetary matter is slowly spreading a part other theories
believe the planets are physically growing getting bigger and bigger over time
it has been physically measured. Round planets and deities can have happen in a
more course tough and denser vacuum that is itself slowly expanding also. It
follows that the universe seems also to be inflating at a steady constant rate
the Hubble Theory has measured this activity.
The idea that in a younger vacuum field
more denser be it the spheres matter or the vacuum itself – because of weight
and free fall in the course of groups at the stellar level the sphere’s orbited
closer together they were more dense not due to the vacuum but the density of
the stars and system of stars and planets that finally grew older over time.
The idea that the universe conforms as a system with a dense dominion star
making up the group it stands that the space expansion is just making more room
for the matter that exist.
Einstein’s blunder that the universe is
closed to regard the universe as closed
inside of the balloon pointed to
the direction that the vacuum was
constant until they discovered that the universe was expanding. The
possibility that matter formed out of equilibrium contradicts the idea that
binary theory is the birth place of all planetary matter that which is a
specific area in space but I believe is not the beginning. If planetary matter
grew from the equilibrium the weight of it spreads over the surface it resides
on causing the fabric surface to get tenser. Subtle generating matter passing
through the fabric at its earliest era or to say in the beginning all matter
formed before the release of pressure of the bubble or balloon doesn’t allow
for later formation in theory where matter actually came from is the reason
black holes discovered midfield the galaxies illustrates evidence they acted as
portals pending the deity of matter from some other location into this universe
is the reason they exist at all.
No comments:
Post a Comment