DECEPTIONS IN THE SPECIAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY BY RODNEY KAWECKI
A NEW
A NEW
WARP DRIVE FASTER THAN LIGHT TECHNOLOGY
What is E=mq²
They Thought He Couldn't Do It !
But he has !
The difference between a beam of light and mass............................
This problem in relativity is problematic...meaning having to do with equal math not mass....v has no mass at all therefore it cannot formulate with c which in this equation c equals e used for force or propulsion which is its value of course e does have mass but that doesn't mean c can't be pushed faster than c...does it? In Einstein's equations v has a limit because of e energy, which means e is limited by v - all the energy in the world can’t exceed c in relativity seems to mean no energy no matter how great cannot exceed the speed of light c/v.
From the last few paragraphs you have just read lets rethink the impossibility. Relativity says e would have to have infinite mass. But from the earlier paragraphs in SPACE the vacuum in an empty field meaning away from any celestial mass astronomically far away from any celestial mass the (space)field measures zero density. Our ship in such a field also measures zero because there exist no greater density than that of the field space we are traveling through and are in. Our ship will therefore not increase in mass because the field density never changes – it is neither greater because of a planet atmosphere density nor is it less because of such change in field density.
Since the gravity density of space is zero an infinite amount of e is interchangeable with the zero point density of the space field. What this means is our ship in earths 1G field density to travel close to the speed of light needs a specific amount of propulsion capacity. On earth that amount measures c. v the velocity we want to reach because space and (weight) cause by friction or gravity are interchangeable defined measurable by the density of the field which equals f and because the density of earth’s gravity field is equal to 1G, the target v/c is reached in earth’s gravity field where e is achieved. In relativity Einstein assumes that gravity is the same everywhere in the universe, that any change in the density of the field has no affect on the speed of the object. But we know that friction occurs and there exist an attraction on any object moving along the earth’s surface. We also know that what goes up also comes down. In relativity the c components of light which are the lack of mass in an ordinary object – are not affected by g which is gravity so c is the fastest anything can travel.
This logic is so easy to understand yet seems not believable because of r which is relativity. In r (relativity) Einstein talks about light having zero mass yet it is not light that is traveling at v/e, it is mass and mass we know that travels through g that we measure as 1G that slows the acceleration of the moving body does so at a specific rate. We observe Newton’s laws on earth and the constant of 1G to measure 9.8 meters a second. So an object on are planet’s surface all objects fall at a specific speed. Therefore e of a mass in free fall all abort weight which is converted to mass during momentum or acceleration of the object.
In space we rely on e as are common denominator when we defer the velocity of m, mass in space. Since the department of the space in the universe density is zero or 0G the stress both physical and kinetic value of e is changed from 1G on earth to 0G in space. W which is also lifted out from the equation due to e which on earth is comparable to e in space e becomes e2. In relativity E=mc². ( E?=m°c/v)
E in space equals zero. M the mass of the vessel in space also equals zero. c/v are interchangeable.
E (also meaning propulsion value source) on earth at 1G equals 2e ( or e + e = 2E) instead of e°. e + g = 2E. In space where the g density of the field is zero (g°) e now equals 2E. In space 2E =m° c/v. at the speed of light. 2E equals q in space equals c/v² where q because of (2E m°c²) E=mq where q in space is equal with 2E (e – g = 2E) q equals 2E v is 372,000 miles a second.
E=mq (q/v)
Gravity is measured by the density of the field in question if the field density is different than some other measurement G changes. At celestial planetary scaled usually based on a planet the density of the vacuum doesn’t change it is the density of the planet atmosphere its density from which its gravity measurement is equated.
On earth e the energy needed to propel to light speed e of an equal force to propel against g gravity was also needed. E becomes 2E. In space where m mass equals zero is not changed by any reason effecting e (e/m) energy mass on earth which was the force of g gravity in space v the velocity of our vessel having 2E (2e=mc) the speed of the ship has the ability to travel twice the speed of light with no real changes in relativity except the extension of e. If indeed the problem of infinite mass in relativity does exist in empty space it will at E=mq square you make the choice.
.................................................................................................................................................................. Problems in the Hubble Model?
The bubble theory in Hubble Theory is an inflating balloon - the problem lays in where is the pressure coming into the bubble at. Galaxies all seem to have a dark black hole at the deepest area of the galactic Milky Way Galaxy. Observations of Hubble's Inflating Balloon model shows a balloon inflation putting a mouth piece to inflate his balloon. My next book tells this story about our Universe but expands it as a point of origin. There should theoretically be a black hole for its nucleus somewhere preferably at the center of the universe leading into unknown territory the galactic model tells us that point and origin also rethought in my next book. So whats the difference between the galaxies and the universe singularity theories? I explain more on that in my next book. (Looking for advance publisher for my next title).
How the universe conserves its energy is also explained in this new book.
Referring back to E=mq which acts as a bi-product to special relativity and E=mc .. the earliest theories on energy and power mechanics disclose the proof in E=mq but like history doesn't explain everything about everything how a ship travels 80 years into the Infinite Future in Albert Einstein's space ship is a bi-product of his literature not originally a bi-product of its mathematics. See there just isn't the problem that Einstein can travel into the future but there's also the problem of traveling back from the future it seems doesn't exist in his scientific studied literature.
My next book will answer a lot of left over' question about the universe's origin using the Hubble model and expanding on Einstein's speed of light made of LIGHT space ship in detail as shown in this article
